| Title |
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006853.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Jan Schoones, Els CHM Van den Ende |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 464 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 100 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 9% |
| Researcher | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 93 | 19% |
| Unknown | 121 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 12% |
| Unknown | 136 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,868,032
of 24,010,679 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,154
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,791
of 96,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,010,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.