↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006853.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Jan Schoones, Els CHM Van den Ende

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 423 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 22%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 94 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 13%
Sports and Recreations 44 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 56 13%
Unknown 110 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,548,297
of 20,938,646 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,645
of 12,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,400
of 321,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,938,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.