The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006853.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Jan Schoones, Els CHM Van den Ende |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 478 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 103 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 9% |
Researcher | 38 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 5% |
Other | 94 | 19% |
Unknown | 132 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 150 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 45 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
Psychology | 13 | 3% |
Other | 59 | 12% |
Unknown | 148 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,104,293
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,289
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,579
of 109,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.