↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006853.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Jan Schoones, Els CHM Van den Ende

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 340 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 24 7%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 58 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 13%
Sports and Recreations 32 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Psychology 13 4%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 72 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,358,767
of 17,489,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,458
of 11,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,414
of 297,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,489,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.