↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
607 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
506 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003539.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra R Arnold, Sharon E Straus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 490 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 18%
Researcher 58 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Other 29 6%
Other 104 21%
Unknown 115 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 185 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 6%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Psychology 20 4%
Other 80 16%
Unknown 134 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,653,749
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,531
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,483
of 71,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.