↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hajo Wildschut, Marieke I Both, Suzanne Medema, Eeke Thomee, Mark F Wildhagen, Nathalie Kapp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 118 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 25 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,218,996
of 16,791,453 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,917
of 11,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,079
of 293,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,791,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.