↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hajo Wildschut, Marieke I Both, Suzanne Medema, Eeke Thomee, Mark F Wildhagen, Nathalie Kapp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Other 10 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 33 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,001,666
of 21,796,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,668
of 12,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,190
of 325,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,796,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.