The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Medical methods for mid‐trimester termination of pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005216.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hajo Wildschut, Marieke I Both, Suzanne Medema, Eeke Thomee, Mark F Wildhagen, Nathalie Kapp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Maldives | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,403,086
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,135
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,224
of 198,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.