↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical methods for mid‐trimester termination of pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Medical methods for mid‐trimester termination of pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hajo Wildschut, Marieke I Both, Suzanne Medema, Eeke Thomee, Mark F Wildhagen, Nathalie Kapp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 160 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 48 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 56 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,403,086
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,135
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,224
of 198,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.