↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for preventing anthrax

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Vaccines for preventing anthrax
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006403.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Donegan, Richard Bellamy, Carrol L Gamble

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Psychology 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 32 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,856,374
of 21,152,972 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,670
of 12,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,233
of 322,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,152,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.