↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006949.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasja HJ Van Veen, Diana NJ Lockwood, Wim H van Brakel, Jose Ramirez, Jan Hendrik Richardus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 19%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,016,490
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,342
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,739
of 122,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.