↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006949.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasja HJ Van Veen, Diana NJ Lockwood, Wim H van Brakel, Jose Ramirez Jr, Jan Hendrik Richardus

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,982,582
of 15,807,382 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,736
of 11,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,055
of 407,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,807,382 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.