↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating scabies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating scabies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000320.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Strong, Paul Johnstone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 266 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Researcher 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 57 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Psychology 10 4%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 67 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#969,859
of 19,458,329 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,393
of 11,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,088
of 308,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,458,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.