↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating scabies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating scabies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000320.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Strong, Paul Johnstone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 313 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 15%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 79 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 88 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,218,042
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,802
of 12,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,056
of 68,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.