↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercises for mechanical neck disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
113 tweeters
facebook
24 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1057 Mendeley
Title
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004250.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Gross, Theresa M Kay, Jean-Philippe Paquin, Samuel Blanchette, Patrick Lalonde, Trevor Christie, Genevieve Dupont, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Geoff Gelley, Charles H Goldsmith, Mario Forget, Jan L Hoving, Gert Brønfort, Pasqualina L Santaguida

Abstract

Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. Exercise is one treatment approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,057 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1038 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 227 21%
Student > Bachelor 157 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 9%
Researcher 87 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 86 8%
Other 224 21%
Unknown 182 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 329 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 258 24%
Sports and Recreations 52 5%
Psychology 43 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 3%
Other 120 11%
Unknown 222 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#235,723
of 17,609,679 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#484
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,924
of 296,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,609,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.