↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chondroitin for osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
266 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
6 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
622 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chondroitin for osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005614.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasvinder A Singh, Shahrzad Noorbaloochi, Roderick MacDonald, Lara J Maxwell

Abstract

Osteoarthritis, a common joint disorder, is one of the leading causes of disability. Chondroitin has emerged as a new treatment. Previous meta-analyses have shown contradictory results on the efficacy of chondroitin. This, in addition to the publication of more trials, necessitates a systematic review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 266 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 622 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 618 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 15%
Student > Bachelor 76 12%
Researcher 74 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 8%
Other 40 6%
Other 119 19%
Unknown 167 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 3%
Other 93 15%
Unknown 192 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 301. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#99,509
of 23,396,451 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#181
of 12,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,169
of 355,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,396,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.