| Title |
Alpha lipoic acid for dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004244.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Klugman, Justin Sauer, Naji Tabet, Robert Howard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 28% |
| Psychology | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,533,686
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,376
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,471
of 133,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.