↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alpha lipoic acid for dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Alpha lipoic acid for dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004244.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Klugman, Justin Sauer, Naji Tabet, Robert Howard

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Psychology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 20 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,054,321
of 16,888,555 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,430
of 11,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,386
of 293,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,888,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.