| Title |
Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004399.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Burr, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Alison Avenell, Anja Tuulonen |
| Abstract |
Open angle glaucoma (OAG) is a common cause of blindness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 65 | 20% |
| Unknown | 94 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 103 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,169,969
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,623
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,719
of 168,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.