↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
Title
Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002111.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Norton, June D Cody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 327 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 75 23%
Unknown 88 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 11%
Psychology 17 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 105 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,761,266
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,262
of 12,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,869
of 164,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.