↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Capsaicin for allergic rhinitis in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Capsaicin for allergic rhinitis in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004460.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Cheng, Xiang Ning Yang, Xian Liu, Shi Ping Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 24 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 29 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,072,910
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,923
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,742
of 66,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.