↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for bleeding oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for bleeding oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002233.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gennaro D'Amico, Luigi Pagliaro, Giada Pietrosi, Ilaria Tarantino

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
United States 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 99 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2012.
All research outputs
#3,639,773
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,985
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,442
of 272,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.