↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006114.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ichiro M Omori, Norio Watanabe, Atsuo Nakagawa, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui, Hugh McGuire, Rachel Churchill, Toshi A Furukawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 272 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 20%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 55 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 34%
Psychology 36 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 67 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,242,396
of 19,451,913 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,903
of 11,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,595
of 308,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,451,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.