Our Cochrane Review of similar experiments revealed under‐detection of AEs with general questioning that may yet be important clinically & to patients, but impact of question type on AE severity & relatedness is unclear https://t.co/2aZTyY8bJ0
「医薬品の有害事象に関する情報を収集するために臨床試験参加者に健康状態について質問すること」に関するコクランレビューの日本語要約です。症状に関する自由回答式質問とチェックリスト型質問の併用を示唆する結果です。 #CochraneDatabaseOfSystematicReviews #メタ疫学 https://t.co/Mb1NTwSPPW
Eliciting adverse effects (AE) data from participants in clinical trials @CochraneLibrary https://t.co/fLrq7fZoaY This supports concerns that methods to elicit participant-reported AEs influence the detection of them. There is a risk for under-detection of
RT @CochraneHTN: Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE…
RT @CochraneHTN: Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE…
RT @CochraneHTN: Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE…
Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE2O #CochraneEvidence #ptsafety #drugsafety @cochranecollab
RT @evidpediatria: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/kNHjUTgNQU via @CochraneUK
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/kNHjUTgNQU via @CochraneUK
Ever tried to synthesise adverse event data across trials? 😱. Many issues preventing reliable meta-analysis of harm outcomes. Here is a new paper highlighting one of them - eliciting reliable and comparable information from patients. https://t.co/GawXFzHEW
Questioning clinical trial participants about their health in order to collect information… https://t.co/AA8OarAxuF
"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews"[Journal] OR "The Cochrane library"[Journal… https://t.co/yMCIF27btq
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research https://t.co/XZAcMCrtPl