↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004299.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally A Kilburn, Peter Featherstone, Bernie Higgins, Richard Brindle

Abstract

Cellulitis and erysipelas are now usually considered manifestations of the same condition, a skin infection associated with severe pain and systemic symptoms. A range of antibiotic treatments are suggested in guidelines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 244 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 47 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#869,948
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,273
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,678
of 294,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.