↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003234.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison M MacLeod, Marion K Campbell, June D Cody, Conal Daly, Adrian Grant, Izhar Khan, Kannaiyan S Rabindranath, Luke Vale, Sheila A Wallace

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Engineering 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 26 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,516,059
of 18,096,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,867
of 11,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,848
of 298,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,096,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.