↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary marine fatty acids (fish oil) for asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Dietary marine fatty acids (fish oil) for asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis CK Thien, Stefano De Luca, Rosalie K Woods, Michael J Abramson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 29%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 18 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,060,990
of 16,004,888 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,796
of 11,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,168
of 368,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,004,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.