Title |
Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods for preventing pregnancy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001326.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jo Power, Rebecca French, Frances M. Cowan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 30 | 14% |
Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 23% |
Unknown | 50 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
Psychology | 7 | 3% |
Other | 28 | 13% |
Unknown | 51 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,982,459
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,697
of 12,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,116
of 68,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.