↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration for preventing retinal detachment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration for preventing retinal detachment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003170.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles P Wilkinson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Other 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,453,668
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,069
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,229
of 273,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.