↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012925
Authors

Smisha Agarwal, Lavanya Vasudevan, Tigest Tamrat, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Hanna Bergman, Nicholas Henschke, Garrett L Mehl, Marita S Fønhus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,245,384
of 17,366,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,590
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,298
of 374,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,366,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.