↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home‐based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Home‐based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006755.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Coupar, Alex Pollock, Lynn A Legg, Catherine Sackley, Paulette van Vliet

Abstract

With an increased focus on home-based stroke services and the undertaking of programmes, targeted at upper limb recovery within clinical practice, a systematic review of home-based therapy programmes for individuals with upper limb impairment following stroke was required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 295 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 15%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Other 16 5%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Engineering 22 7%
Psychology 20 7%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 86 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,882,399
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,726
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,464
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.