↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for reducing fatigue during cancer treatment in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
254 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychosocial interventions for reducing fatigue during cancer treatment in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006953.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martine Margaretha Goedendorp, Marieke FM Gielissen, Constantijn AHHVM Verhagen, Gijs Bleijenberg

Abstract

Fatigue is a common symptom in cancer patients receiving active treatment. There are a limited number of reviews evaluating interventions for fatigue during active treatment, and they are restricted to patients with advanced cancer, or to patients during radiotherapy. To date there is no systematic review on psychosocial interventions for fatigue during cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 391 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Researcher 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 9%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 93 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 28%
Psychology 61 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 12%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 104 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,813,579
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,214
of 13,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,082
of 186,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.