↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Drug therapy for the management of cancer‐related fatigue

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Drug therapy for the management of cancer‐related fatigue
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006704.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ollie Minton, Alison Richardson, Michael Sharpe, Matthew Hotopf, Patrick Stone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 204 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 17 8%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 64 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Psychology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 67 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,256,386
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,737
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,757
of 105,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.