↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reading aids for adults with low vision

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Reading aids for adults with low vision
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003303.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianni Virgili, Ruthy Acosta, Lori L Grover, Sharon A Bentley, Giovanni Giacomelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 19%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,054
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,534
of 224,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.