↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aids for mechanical cleaning of teeth with fixed braces

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Aids for mechanical cleaning of teeth with fixed braces
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012931
Authors

Hock Hoe Goh, Bridget Doubleday

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#11,541,579
of 14,544,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,064
of 11,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,060
of 273,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,544,183 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.