↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Assessing the effects of solid versus liquid dosage forms of oral medications on adherence and acceptability in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the effects of solid versus liquid dosage forms of oral medications on adherence and acceptability in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012783
Authors

Audrey Lajoinie, Perrine Janiaud, Emilie Henin, Jean-Cédric Gleize, Clémentine Berlion, Kim An Nguyen, Patrice Nony, Francois Gueyffier, Delphine Maucort-Boulch, Behrouz Kassaï Koupaï

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 37 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 39 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,108,994
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,542
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,019
of 330,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.