↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hands-on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Hands-on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006609.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jackie Winter, Susan Hunter, Julius Sim, Peter Crome

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 172 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 19%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 44 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,354,286
of 14,674,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,292
of 11,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,789
of 281,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,674,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.