↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for helping people recognise early signs of recurrence in bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for helping people recognise early signs of recurrence in bipolar disorder
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Morriss, Mohammad Amir Faizal, Ashley P Jones, Paula R Williamson, Catherine A Bolton, James P McCarthy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 73 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 26%
Psychology 49 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 78 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,054
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,148
of 173,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.