↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for helping people recognise early signs of recurrence in bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for helping people recognise early signs of recurrence in bipolar disorder
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Morriss, Mohammad Amir Faizal, Ashley P Jones, Paula R Williamson, Catherine A Bolton, James P McCarthy

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 225 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 26%
Psychology 48 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 63 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,636,187
of 20,430,303 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,603
of 12,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,635
of 315,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,430,303 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.