↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alpha‐2 adrenergic agonists for the prevention of cardiac complications among adults undergoing surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Alpha‐2 adrenergic agonists for the prevention of cardiac complications among adults undergoing surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004126.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dallas Duncan, Ashwin Sankar, W Scott Beattie, Duminda N Wijeysundera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 70 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 73 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,398,759
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,858
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,419
of 348,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.