↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007710.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Sushant Saluja, Helena O'Flynn, Alessandra Sorrentino, Daniel Leach, Andrew Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 8 5%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 63 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 70 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,078,644
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,291
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,769
of 331,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.