↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Single dose oral ibuprofen plus codeine for acute postoperative pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Single dose oral ibuprofen plus codeine for acute postoperative pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010107.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Derry, Samuel M Karlin, R Andrew Moore

Abstract

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 3, 2013. There is good evidence that combining two different analgesics in fixed doses in a single tablet can provide better pain relief in acute pain and headache than either drug alone, and that the drug-specific effects are essentially additive. This appears to be broadly true in postoperative pain and migraine headache across a range of different drug combinations and when tested in the same and different trials. Some combinations of ibuprofen and codeine are available without prescription (but usually only from a pharmacy) where the dose of codeine is lower, and with a prescription when the dose of codeine is higher.Use of combination analgesics that contain codeine has been a source of some concern because of misuse from over-the-counter preparations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 49 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 52 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,934,036
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,260
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,577
of 352,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.