↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
16 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000184.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Cluver, Gillian ML Gyte, Marlene Sinclair, Therese Dowswell, G Justus Hofmeyr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Other 23 8%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 77 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 17%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 86 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,528,875
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,282
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,253
of 368,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.