The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Miscellaneous treatments for antipsychotic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000208.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karla Soares‐Weiser, John Rathbone, Yusuke Ogawa, Kiyomi Shinohara, Hanna Bergman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Norway | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| China | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 317 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 139 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 8% |
| Psychology | 19 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 149 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,389,208
of 26,735,240 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,665
of 13,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,623
of 353,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,735,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.