↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diuretic therapy for newborn infants with posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Diuretic therapy for newborn infants with posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Whitelaw, Luc P Brion, Colin R Kennedy, David Odd

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 58%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 18 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2011.
All research outputs
#3,453,666
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,024
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,720
of 276,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.