↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Depot medroxyprogesterone versus Norethisterone oenanthate for long‐acting progestogenic contraception.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Depot medroxyprogesterone versus Norethisterone oenanthate for long‐acting progestogenic contraception.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005214.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverly H. Draper, Chelsea Morroni, Margaret N Hoffman, Jennifer A Smit, Mags E. Beksinska, Janet P. Hapgood, Lize van der Merwe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 49 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,812
of 90,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.