↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Depot medroxyprogesterone versus Norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Depot medroxyprogesterone versus Norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005214.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverly H. Draper, Chelsea Morroni, Margaret N Hoffman, Jennifer A Smit, Mags E. Beksinska, Janet P. Hapgood, Lize van der Merwe

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 28 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,219,968
of 13,999,320 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,193
of 10,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,002
of 276,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,999,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.