↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma-induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
Title
Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma-induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010438.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet Hunt, Simon Stanworth, Nicola Curry, Tom Woolley, Chris Cooper, Obioha Ukoumunne, Zhivko Zhelev, Chris Hyde

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 324 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Researcher 34 10%
Other 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 67 20%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Psychology 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 93 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,086,514
of 24,460,744 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,312
of 12,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,753
of 261,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,460,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.