↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma‑induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma‑induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010438.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet Hunt, Simon Stanworth, Nicola Curry, Tom Woolley, Chris Cooper, Obioha Ukoumunne, Zhivko Zhelev, Chris Hyde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 347 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Researcher 37 11%
Other 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 93 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Psychology 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 106 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,190,826
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,479
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,688
of 271,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.