The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Skin preparation with alcohol versus alcohol followed by any antiseptic for preventing bacteraemia or contamination of blood for transfusion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007948.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joan Webster, Sally EM Bell‐Syer, Ruth Foxlee |
Abstract |
Blood for transfusion may become contaminated at any point between collection and transfusion and may result in bacteraemia (the presence of bacteria in the blood), severe illness or even death for the blood recipient. Donor arm skin is one potential source of blood contamination, so it is usual to cleanse the skin with an antiseptic before blood donation. One-step and two-step alcohol based antiseptic regimens are both commonly advocated but there is uncertainty as to which is most effective. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 42 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,658,711
of 25,972,223 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,190
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,547
of 369,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,972,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.