| Title |
Altered dietary salt intake for people with chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010070.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma J McMahon, Katrina L Campbell, Judith D Bauer, David W Mudge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 14% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,659,687
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,544
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,364
of 269,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.