↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
411 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
478 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Grilli, Craig Ramsay, Silvia Minozzi

Abstract

The mass media frequently cover health related topics, are the leading source of information about important health issues, and are targeted by those who aim to influence the behaviour of health professionals and patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 461 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 16%
Researcher 63 13%
Student > Bachelor 53 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 11%
Lecturer 30 6%
Other 119 25%
Unknown 85 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 15%
Social Sciences 70 15%
Psychology 27 6%
Arts and Humanities 11 2%
Other 68 14%
Unknown 105 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,127,890
of 21,334,388 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,680
of 12,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,221
of 230,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,334,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.