| Title |
Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Grilli, Craig Ramsay, Silvia Minozzi |
| Abstract |
The mass media frequently cover health related topics, are the leading source of information about important health issues, and are targeted by those who aim to influence the behaviour of health professionals and patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 486 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 16% |
| Researcher | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 119 | 24% |
| Unknown | 102 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 72 | 14% |
| Psychology | 26 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 70 | 14% |
| Unknown | 123 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,236,833
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,850
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,955
of 123,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.