↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Loop diuretics for patients receiving blood transfusions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Loop diuretics for patients receiving blood transfusions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010138.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Sarai, Aaron M Tejani

Abstract

Blood transfusions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, or torsemide) is common practice, especially among people who are at risk for circulatory overload, pulmonary oedema or both.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 45 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,545,354
of 20,473,269 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,662
of 12,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,227
of 228,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,473,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.