↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
614 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007989.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omer Khan, Michael Ferriter, Nick Huband, Melanie J Powney, Jane A Dennis, Conor Duggan

Abstract

Sexual offending is a serious social problem, a public health issue, and a major challenge for social policy. Victim surveys indicate high incidence and prevalence levels and it is accepted that there is a high proportion of hidden sexual victimisation. Surveys report high levels of psychiatric morbidity in survivors of sexual offences.Biological treatments of sex offenders include antilibidinal medication, comprising hormonal drugs that have a testosterone-suppressing effect, and non-hormonal drugs that affect libido through other mechanisms. The three main classes of testosterone-suppressing drugs in current use are progestogens, antiandrogens, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. Medications that affect libido through other means include antipsychotics and serotonergic antidepressants (SSRIs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 614 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 611 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 16%
Student > Bachelor 84 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 13%
Researcher 74 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 8%
Other 112 18%
Unknown 112 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 25%
Psychology 130 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 12%
Social Sciences 46 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Other 63 10%
Unknown 133 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,079,336
of 18,940,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,694
of 11,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,065
of 225,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,940,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.