↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dance movement therapy for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
21 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
1130 Mendeley
Title
Dance movement therapy for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009895.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie Meekums, Vicky Karkou, E Andrea Nelson

Abstract

Depression is a debilitating condition affecting more than 350 million people worldwide (WHO 2012) with a limited number of evidence-based treatments. Drug treatments may be inappropriate due to side effects and cost, and not everyone can use talking therapies.There is a need for evidence-based treatments that can be applied across cultures and with people who find it difficult to verbally articulate thoughts and feelings. Dance movement therapy (DMT) is used with people from a range of cultural and intellectual backgrounds, but effectiveness remains unclear.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 1123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 227 20%
Student > Master 168 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 8%
Researcher 78 7%
Student > Postgraduate 59 5%
Other 173 15%
Unknown 330 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 286 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 155 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 116 10%
Social Sciences 44 4%
Sports and Recreations 34 3%
Other 129 11%
Unknown 366 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#614,606
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,022
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,925
of 269,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.