↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007897.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riitta Sauni, Jos H Verbeek, Jukka Uitti, Merja Jauhiainen, Kathleen Kreiss, Torben Sigsgaard

Abstract

Dampness and mould in buildings have been associated with adverse respiratory symptoms, asthma and respiratory infections of inhabitants. Moisture damage is a very common problem in private houses, workplaces and public buildings such as schools.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 86 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Psychology 7 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 96 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,113,978
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,558
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,189
of 255,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.