↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
466 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Ballini, Antonella Negro, Susanna Maltoni, Luca Vignatelli, Gerd Flodgren, Iveta Simera, Jane Holmes, Roberto Grilli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 466 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 464 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 19%
Researcher 48 10%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 95 20%
Unknown 129 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 13%
Psychology 20 4%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Computer Science 13 3%
Other 73 16%
Unknown 151 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#768,324
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,372
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,148
of 270,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.