↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Ballini, Antonella Negro, Susanna Maltoni, Luca Vignatelli, Gerd Flodgren, Iveta Simera, Jane Holmes, Roberto Grilli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 447 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 19%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Bachelor 43 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 94 21%
Unknown 118 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 14%
Psychology 20 4%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Computer Science 13 3%
Other 70 16%
Unknown 140 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,382,132
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,933
of 13,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,597
of 261,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.