↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Ballini, Antonella Negro, Susanna Maltoni, Luca Vignatelli, Gerd Flodgren, Iveta Simera, Jane Holmes, Roberto Grilli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 451 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 19%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 85 19%
Unknown 129 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 13%
Psychology 20 4%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Computer Science 13 3%
Other 61 13%
Unknown 151 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,127,946
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,204
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,649
of 270,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.