The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
As required versus fixed schedule analgesic administration for postoperative pain in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011404.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Erskine, Philip J Wiffen, Joy A Conlon |
| Abstract |
Acute postoperative pain occurs as a result of tissue damage following surgery. Administering the appropriate analgesia to children is a complex process and it is unclear whether children's postoperative pain is more successfully treated by using 'as required' (when pain occurs) (termed 'pro re nata' or PRN) or (irrespective of pain at the time of administration). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| Canada | 4 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 16% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 95 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,391,124
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,801
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,761
of 271,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.