↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
Title
Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004493.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger E Thomas, Philip RA Baker, Bennett C Thomas, Diane L Lorenzetti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 453 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 20%
Researcher 84 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 80 17%
Unknown 83 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 14%
Psychology 61 13%
Social Sciences 50 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 102 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#287,374
of 17,833,983 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#591
of 11,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,402
of 222,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,833,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.