↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Embed badge What is this page?

Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male-to-female transgender women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male-to-female transgender women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009337
Pubmed ID
21901734
Authors

Chongyi Wei, Amy Herrick, H Fisher Raymond, Andrew Anglemyer, Antonio Gerbase, Seth M Noar

Abstract

Social marketing interventions have been shown to both promote and change many health-related behaviours and issues. As the HIV epidemic continues to disproportionately affect MSM and transgender women around the world, social marketing interventions have the potential to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among these populations.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
El Salvador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 321 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 18%
Student > Master 52 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 76 23%
Unknown 57 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 29%
Social Sciences 55 16%
Psychology 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 3%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 67 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,136,253
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,367
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,085
of 125,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.