The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male‐to‐female transgender women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chongyi Wei, Amy Herrick, H Fisher Raymond, Andrew Anglemyer, Antonio Gerbase, Seth M Noar |
| Abstract |
Social marketing interventions have been shown to both promote and change many health-related behaviours and issues. As the HIV epidemic continues to disproportionately affect MSM and transgender women around the world, social marketing interventions have the potential to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among these populations. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 352 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 22% |
| Unknown | 79 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 56 | 15% |
| Psychology | 31 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 90 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,028,965
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,685
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,503
of 139,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.