The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Non‐invasive interventions for improving well‐being and quality of life in patients with lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004282.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José‐Ramón Rueda, Ivan Solà, Antonio Pascual, Mireia Subirana Casacuberta |
| Abstract |
This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 4, 2004 of The Cochrane Library. Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death globally. Despite advances in treatment, the outlook for the majority of patients remains grim and most face a pessimistic future accompanied by sometimes devastating effects on emotional and psychological health. Although chemotherapy is accepted as an effective treatment for advanced lung cancer, the high prevalence of treatment-related side effects as well the symptoms of disease progression highlight the need for high-quality palliative and supportive care to minimise symptom distress and to promote quality of life. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 533 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 13% |
| Researcher | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 96 | 18% |
| Unknown | 155 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 89 | 16% |
| Psychology | 55 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 10% |
| Unknown | 175 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,549,826
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,933
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,133
of 139,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.